bionapex.blogg.se

Shotcut video editor mkv
Shotcut video editor mkv




shotcut video editor mkv

Any thoughts on that? If the only reason h.264 is not recommended is because it is cpu intensive to work with then I’m probably ok as I have a pretty high end system, ryzen 5900x, 32gb ddr4 3600 ram, gen 4 nvme ssd… then again I am doing 4k60fps…Īs for options I was referencing the advanced options, use sub-clip, deinterlace, override frame rate, fps, frame rate conversion, and convert to bt.709 colorspace.Īlso, a lot of people say that editing in h.264 is a bad idea so suggested I actually convert to ProRes, import and edit, then export to h.264 again to upload to youtube. Also, a lot of people say that editing in h.264 is a bad idea so suggested I actually convert to ProRes, import and edit, then export to h.264 again to upload to youtube. I am going to experiment with quality in shutter vs shotcut. You said that h.264 VFR source converted to h.264 CFR(aka using the shotcut built in convert to edit friendly ‘good’ option) should be ok, and that is what I am leaning towards, but from what I’ve read I thought the conversion will compress things again causing a reduction in video quality? I was experimenting with shutter encode so that I can set more options that shotcut allows but admittedly it takes quite a while. I’ve learned a bit, or at least have been reading a lot about codecs since I posted this. When I said “a little faster” I meant how long it took to encode to the edit friendly version. Do any of the other options matter or just leave them to default? I really can’t find much detail on this.Īlso, is there a way to convert multiple files? Dragging them in one by one will be annoying, it took 24 minutes to do a 30 minute video and I have probably 8+ hours of video to go through split up across a dozen videos. Sorry if dumb question, I am pretty knew to video editing, but would really like to upload to youtube, reasonably, the best video quality I can. My source video codec is h.264, am I actually losing anything if I just use that when converting? Other than it taking a little longer? If there will still be some loss in quality how much is there and how much of a difference between good better and best? Now it’s a little faster than “good” which is h.264 but the file size is huge. Originally I thought I wanted “best” which is ut video.

shotcut video editor mkv

Hi all, using my phone as my recording device, 4k60fps, but apparently it is variable refresh rate so I am getting the message to convert.






Shotcut video editor mkv